essentially invade and bully its neighbor in the way that russia is doing with ukraine and the world is powerless to stop it, then the system we set up hasn t worked. so i think he s right about that. what new architecture would be more successful, i don t know, but as i was listening to him speak, i was thinking about whether we can form a broader global line of economies that would agree essentially to wall off the world economy, in even broader terms, any nation that would invade its neighbor. you know, i was reading last night the charter of the united nations, 1945, the 24th of october charter. and it says, the united nations may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be to maintain or restore international peace and security. and yet, congressman, it seems like there really isn t any action that the world can take to stop a unilateral invasion
material but it is not enough. do we need to get material but it is not enough. do we need to get more material but it is not enough. do we need to get more inventive, - material but it is not enough. do we need to get more inventive, and - need to get more inventive, and melinda? i send cv issues with a nato response, it would bring nato into the war but there is another option, there is the un charter, there is article 42 of the un charter and i will read it. it says the security council consider that measures not involving the use of armed force would be inadequate or proved to be inadequate, it may take action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. and they have shown before that they can bypass the security council, that the general assembly can take a vote, so why is the united nations, which is there to defend humanity, not triggering article 42? i defend humanity, not triggering article 42? ., ., , , ., artic