And there is an argument, if you take their read. i think when they get to court on the evidentiary hearing on this, it s not going to look as close or as fuzzy as it does right now, and i know that jack smith was well aware of the removal problem. there is also the possibility that this could stay part of it in state court and part of it in federal court. there is that exception is available, and could well exist. so the big loss to me in going to federal court is no cameras. and i think the american public needs to see all of this. certainly we were watching what has unfolded in the past, january 6th, the watergate, impeachment hearings. there is, obviously, a huge public interest in these things. gentlemen, thank you so much. i d love to have you back on again. sure. now, also donald trump and 18 co-defendants were charged as you know in georgia s 2020
Difficult for mark meadows to get this information in evidence. it s inconceivable they re going to put him on the stand and subject him to cross-examination at this early stage, yet he s got to get this information in front of the judge. what they did in their motion was cite from an, in a selective way, from the indictment and sort of spin it the way they wanted it to appear. and there is an argument if you take their read. i think when they get to court on the evidentiary hearing on this, it s not going to look as close or as fuzzy as it does right now. and i know that jack smith was well aware of the removal problem. and there s also the possibility that this could stay part of it in state court and part of it in federal court. that exception is available and could well exist. so the big loss to me in going to federal court is no cameras, and i think the american public