officials and other colleagues trying to understand what the implications were. so i am going back to the hill today, going to meet with a lot of of my colleagues and get to where we need to go. i know we have to pay our bills. that is probably the most overriding thing driving me. but as i said yesterday, there are parts of this bill that i would not vote for if they were a free standing bill. the whole process is not one that is the way that the government should operate. we need regular order. that to me, congresswoman, sounds like a reluctant yes at this point. am i reading that right? i am not going to tell you one way or the other because i am going to keep asking questions and if i learn anything that s very disturbing today, i will have you know, i want to understand how precedent setting this bill is. how will this impact future bills? what are the domestic spending cuts, what are the programs really going to cut? are seniors going to be hurt. real questions th
Loud trump but actually different on policy. yes. and he took aim specifically at the first step act which was one of the most bipartisan accomplishments of the trump administration. interesting move. i mean, he is mapping out a campaign that in many ways is to the right of donald trump. he is relitigating covid saying donald trump should have done less, should have been less restrictive and less closures, repealing the first step among ot other things. district attorney vetted for the first version of the first step back. he was very different in congress. also a supporter of aid to ukraine them. they are trying to figure out how to differentiate themselves from donald trump in a way that breaks through and frankly the answer tend to be riding to the further right. you have to worry that this will become a general election and some of the positions taking are radioactive to a general election audience. the idea that he could be the person who could do unlike