signals intelligence, the kind of signals we protect most fiercely as a country and we also know that he lied about it and sent one, maybe two lawyers to lie about it. why not charge both the crime and the obstruction of the investigation tomorrow? i can t answer that question for you because i m not involved in the investigation and investigations happen behind closed doors hopefully without leaks. what i can tell you is one of the anxieties that i have is if the special counsel chooses not to charge for the dozens and dozens of highly sensitive classified documents that were laying around on a carpet in mar-a-lago, i worry that maybe the special counsel doesn t explain that decision. that does the country a real disservice. remember, i was on the intelligence committee so i think a lot about oversight and the health of our intelligence community. if the special counsel chooses to your point to not charge on something where it looks as clear as day that there was a violation of law,
i think we re doing the families in newtown a real disservice if we jumped and dpifid the first thing that came to mind. there is a lot of things that don t work in all of this. i think everything needs to be looked at, that s for sure. we don t want to jump and do the wrong thing and this plan by michael bloomberg, of course, is michael bloomberg himself stated he wants to go after the assault weapons ban. so kind of a smoke screen, what michael bloomberg is doing that. he says that, but these two ads, you know, are with regard to these background checks, chris freights, what do you think about this 10%? there was such a ground swell in december post newtown and now 10% fewer americans favor, we re talking major changes in gun control. why do you think? i think what we re seeing is why the president and the vice president and congressional democrats wanted to strike while the iron was hot. the longer this goes on, the more disinterested people become and the easier it is to buil