nature, and animals. i promise you what you see on your screen will all make sense later tonight. i m going to ask you to go on a ride with me that might be even more far out than when we featured funk legend george clinton or talked ufos. that s later tonight. open mind. please stay with me for it. as you might be able to hear, i m pretty enthused about it. now, actual ufos are also back in the news. we didn t plan that. fighter jet operations by the u.s. shooting some down. we have that story tonight as well. but the pentagon facing pressure to provide even more information. and nobel prize-winning economist paul krugman also here tonight as well. so we really do have a lot cooking for you here to start the week. i hope you stay with us for the whole hour. we ve certainly planned a full hour for you. right now, the top story is the kind of news that would keep rocking any former president, especially one trying to mount a comeback campaign, even if i d be the first
i know what you thinking. kat, that has numbers in it. ew, gross. if i cared about triple digit numbers, i look at ratings for cnn. [laughter] but if this law goes away, it could destroy the internet as we know it. but don t worry, joey. porn will still be available, so you won t lose her second job. get it? you thought i was saying he likes porn, but i m saying he is in porn. thank you for your service. [laughter] so, this week the supreme court heard two cases from families who lost loved ones in terrorist attacks, and those families are suing social media companies, alleging they should be held liable for helping isis. when case involved the 2015 paris attacks. it argued that youtube s algorithms recommended isis propaganda to users. the other case claimed twitter gave isis assistance and didn t do enough to police them from sharing content. and that is where section 230 comes in. it is a short law written in 1996 that is said to have created the internet. it goes like t
biden taking a page out of the watters playbook, trying to pin the blame on his assistant. sorry, johnny. an anonymous source leaking to the washington post that the president s longtime executive secretary may have inadvertently mishandled the document, setting off this growing scandal. now president biden getting frustrated with his friends in the liberal press over his little garage shop of classified horrors. i think you re going to find there s nothing there. i have no regrets. i m following what the lawyers have told me they want me to do. exactly what we re doing. there s no there there. while biden doesn t care, he apparently thinks the american people are with him. i ll answer the question, but here s the deal. you know, quite frankly, it bugs me, that we have serious problem here we re talking about. we re talking about what s going on. the american people don t quite understand why you don t ask me questions about that. ahe. then karine jean-pierre, cap
they got him. and got more including the deadline from the review well past. today having gotten what they wanted they were called onto do something they ve notably not done in any court filing or proceedings so far, namely back up what their clients and allies are suggesting saying these documents were declassified. for the government s part today they signaled their willingness to take this all the way to the supreme court. jessica schneider starts us off and joins us now. let s talk about what the trump legal team told the special master. yeah, well what s interesting is their response to that ultimatum from the special master where he said he might have no choice but to accept the government s claims that 100 of those documents are classified, if trump s team doesn t step windup the proof that the former president declassified them. and that s really something that trump s legal team has resisted repeatedly asserting both in person in court and in legal filings. so, you
tonight. this is far broader than even prosecutors first thought. we re breaking down the path to a criminal conspiracy and why experts now think the most serious charges may be yet to come. why are we doing this now? the house insurrection hearing showed the nation that january 6th was more organized than many realized. the committee, devoted to investigating that day, has revealed truths about that day, and yet the house probe has also underscored something new to many. trump s attempt to overthrow the election was much broader than one day or prepping a one-day crime spree. it was an illegal coup conspiracy starting before the election and lasting months. with criminal plots that had nothing to do with even january 6th and illegal orders by trump that were resisted, so we re going to show this to you tonight, how it began with things that are perfectly legal like filing lawsuits to challenge the results but quickly morphed into something much broader, a conspiracy that inv