A district court in Lucknow rejected a revision petition filed by the Muslim side against a civil judge order in the Teele Wali Masjid case. The civil suit, filed by Lord Sheshnagesh Teeleshwar Mahadev Virajman, seeks the restoration of a Hindu religious structure that was demolished during the reign of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb.
The fast-track court of the civil judge (senior division) on Wednesday rejected the pleas of Pranay Kumar Pandey and Karan Shankar Pandey, seeking to be made a party in the original suit no. 610/1991. The court has set March 7 for the next hearing to address the issue of a comprehensive survey encompassing the entire Gyanvapi mosque premises.
A district court in Lucknow rejected a revision petition filed by the Muslim side against a civil judge order in the Teele Wali Masjid case. The civil suit, filed by Lord Sheshnagesh Teeleshwar Mahadev Virajman, seeks the restoration of a Hindu religious structure that was demolished during the reign of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb.
The fast-track court of civil judge (senior division) has reserved its order on the applications moved by three individuals to become a party in the original suit no. 610/1991. The next hearing is on Feb 28.
HC dismissed all five suits of the Muslim side related to the violation of the Places of Worship (Special Provision) Act, 1991, and further survey of the mosque premises. Hindus claim that the mosque was built by demolishing a part of the adjoining Kashi Vishwanath temple during Aurangzeb’s time