subpoenaed the bank records of at least one trump campaign official. the bank subpoena was actually revealed in a desperate christmas eve lawsuit filed by donald trump s spokesman trying to block the committee from getting his financial records. that lawsuit also revealed that trump s spokesman has been cooperating with the investigation, handing over 1,700 pages of documents and testifying for four hours. but the committee says it actually wants to know more about hundreds of thousands of dollars that trump s spokesman allegedly arranged for a social media and radio advertising campaign encouraging people to attend trump s rally on january 6th. now, even as the committee pushes ahead on uncovering the funding behind the events of january 6th, it is also still pursuing records from the trump white house about that day. now, after donald trump last week asked the supreme court to step in and block the january 6th investigation from getting access to his white house
records. this is interesting because they are even asking the bank j.p. morgan for these records. where does all this stand tonight? poppy, this newest filing shows again as you mentioned the committee is going right to the banks to get the records. getting it directly from the witnesses but going straight to the record holders, themselves. specifically, we learned about the strategy in a challenge to a house select committee s subpoena, again, to j.p. morgan chase for banking records for someone named taylor bud witch. he is former senior adviser for the trump 2020 campaign. he is now former-president donald trump s spokesman. he is arguing that he has already handed over relevant information and that this subpoena from the house select committee to the bank risks releasing private financial information that is not relevant to the investigation. a previously released subpoena highlights why the committee is so interested in him. for example, this the subpoena says that budowich re
subpoenaed the bank records of at least one trump campaign official. the bank subpoena was actually revealed in a desperate christmas eve lawsuit filed by donald trump s spokesman trying to block the committee from getting his financial records. that lawsuit also revealed that trump s spokesman has been cooperating with the investigation, handing over 1,700 pages of documents and testifying for four hours. but the committee says it actually wants to know more about hundreds of thousands of dollars that trump s spokesman allegedly arranged for a social media and radio advertising campaign encouraging people to attend trump s rally on january 6th. now, even as the committee pushes ahead on uncovering the funding behind the events of january 6th, it is also still pursuing records from the trump white house about that day. now, after donald trump last week asked the supreme court to step in and block the january 6th investigation from getting access to his white house records, the committe
now, before the holidays there was a flurry of developments in this investigation. in fact, the january 6th committee for the first time turned its sights on fellow ts members of congress, requesting documents and testimony from two republicans, scott perry of pennsylvania and jim jordan of ohio.anbl leading up to the january 6th insurrection, both congressmen were deeply involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and, in fact, keep president trump in power. now, we also learned just before christmas that the committee had subpoenaed the bank records of at least one trump campaign official.soma the bank subpoena was actually b revealed in a desperate christmas eve lawsuit filed by donald trump s spokesman trying to block the committee from getting his financial records. that lawsuit also revealed that trump s spokesman has been cooperating with the investigation, handing over in 1,700 pages of documents and testifying for four hours.ge but the committee says it co actual
told him if he didn t file a motion to stop the record s release they d hand over this information. budawich did file a motionuring arguing he s given the committee those records and the risks here are in releasing private financial information that s not relevant to this investigation. not material to anything that the house select committee has jurisdiction over. now previously released subpoena from budawich said he soliced a 501c4 organization to conduct a social media and radio advertising campaign encouraging attendance at the january 6th ellipse rally and advancing unsupported claims about the results of the election. the committee claims budawich directed around $200,000 from a source or sources to that 501c4 organization that was not disclosed to the organization to pay for the advertising campaign. so clearly a lot of questions about these finances. again, jake, he argues we already gave you this information. this is over. we ll see what happens now that