i did nothing wrong. donald trump s fourth indictment gives supporters an opponents an image to rally behind. they will remember this as much as they remember his presidential portrait. plus, rebuking ramaswamy. i ve had enough of a guy who sounds like chatgpt. you have no foreign policy experience and it shows. and you know what it shows. how the 38-year-old political newcomer ended up at the center of the first gop debate. and biden s re-election challenge. considering the left he s on their side. what is his plan to do it? good morning and welcome to inside politics sunday, i m manu raju. the nation is waking up to another horrific shooting. three black americans killed at a dollar general store in jacksonville, florida. authorities say the gunman who also is dead left behind a racist manifesto. we ll have more on this and the political reaction later in the program. but first donald trump has taken countless photos during his 40 plus years of celebri
Of what the criminal trial to look like. do you think he has a case to move this to federal court and how quickly could this all be resolved? he definitely has a case. some would say a very good case. it is an exceedingly low bar to get a if you re a federal official to have that matter moved to federal court. the interesting thing to me is proving that he has a colorable federal offense is one part of the standard to get it removed. but using that defense if federal court, that is where he might find bigger trouble to prove that he was acting under some federal law or interpretation of the koo constitution to achieve that objective rather than pursuing some corrupt self-benefit or benefit to his boss. and if he succeeds, trump will try to do the same. but will it be a slam dunk that trump s case will be moved to federal court if meadows succeeds? not at all. they are very different in terms of how the court wouldee valute
Where it will be appropriate but necessary for biden to craft some kind of an argument saying this is the alternative, this person has been indicted or if there is any outcome to the criminal prosecutions and to make that case and that contrast but to do it right now, everybody could watch the news and see what is going on with trump, for biden to get his hands in it now makes it look like he s involved and he wanted to make clear that that process is playing out independently and has nothing to do with him. and he s also got his own problems. namely his support among younger voters and african american voters and hispanics and polls have shown a significant deterioration since the 2020 election. and his allies on the left know he has to make up ground. bernie sanders himself was in new hampshire yesterday, did a rally there and this morning he was asked about the fact that progressives and biden are not only on the same page and he had a message for the folks on the left. in this
Over, so now the trek toward the criminal trials of donald j trump in florida, georgia, washington an new york. tomorrow we ll be watching two key hearings for signs how long that will take. in atlanta, mark meadows will argue that his case should be tr transferred from state to federal court. in washington, the judge overseeing the case will hear arguments over when to schedule the trial. it could be as soon as january. so let s break down the two hearings with our panel of legal experts. former fbi director andy mccabe and carrie cordero and legal affairs correspondent kyle cainy. it is hard to keep track of the mountain of legal problems for donald trump. not just the criminal trials but the civil trials as well. just a brief look at the calendar of the enormous amount of legal problems for the former president. just as the primary season will
Be getting under ware and voters will go to polls. it is a real problem here and a cl challenge for him. and the big thing we re watching is the mark meadows case, the white house chief of staff and arguing that he wanted to move this case, kyle, to federal court, get it out of georgia. explain what he s trying to do here. sure. so his argument is all of the conduct i m charged with, everything that they re saying i did was in the course of my duty as the white house chief of staff and that entitled me to have my case adjudicated by a federal court and dismissed because states are not supposed to be able to criminalize the work of federal officials if it is part of their official duties an that is the key fphrase and that is what the state will say. you were trying to help subvert an election. so we re going to see a mini trial play out where the d.a. wants to call witnesses and to talk about you know, what their experience with mark meadows was and it could be an interesting