charges against a trip. i just think that s too far. i don t know why you chose those words. that s just too far, but we are where we are. so let s talk about the nomination process. have you ever had aniant action with a group called demand justice? no. directly or indirectly? no. have you ever had any interaction with a group called american prospect? no. do you know anything about arbella, is that the right time? have you ever heard of a group called arbella? i ve heard of a group that i think is a rabil la. yes, that s right. do you know anything about them or had any contact with them? no. in your nomination did you notice that people from the left were pretty much cheering you
0 world at large, and i think it s six months, maybe a year, but that goes on at least on an annual basis, and if these a determination that this person still represents a threat to the united states rp they are continued to be confined. that s the way the system works. are you okay with that? as a policy matter, senator? i m not speaking to my views, that s my understanding is that the periodic review system is an executive branch determination of whether or not they are going to continue to hold people does that make sense to you as a way to deal with these detainees? i m not in a position to speak to the policy or the discretion of the executive branch regarding how they are going to handle detainees. the reason i mention it is because in the brief you argued that the executive brarn doesn t have that option, that if you had had your way, the executive branch could not do periodic reviews about the danger the detainee presents to the united states. they would have to make