issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest
Nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this question. nothing has changed. it s understandable that the president would like to redo his initial response from 2019. his outright denial never made sense. what parent does not discuss their children s work? especially when the parent is in the midst of a year s long effort to save that child from self-destructive behavior. and in this case, it s been well documented that in 2013 hunter biden accompanied vice president joe biden on a trip to china, where it was later discovered hunter was meeting with a business associate. as detailed later by josh letterman,nef the reporters who ntn the trip, he wrote, quot what wasn t known then was as he accompanied his father to china, hunter biden was forming a chinese private equity fund that associates said athe time was planning to raise big money, including from china. hunter biden has acknowledged meeting with jonathan lee, a