Actually, just a question. Could you put it back up . Does this program is this program offered to p. U. C. Customers beyond San Francisco . This program is only offered within the jurisdictiontal boundaries of city and county of San Francisco. Any reason why we couldnt offer to all the customers . We could expand the program at the direction of the governing bodies. Yes. We have chosen we have chosen not to. Staying within our city, our city foot print so far. When you say government bodies yourselfs. Ok. [laughter] i didnt know if you meant well, if expansion we would pursue expansion if we were directed to by the board of supervisors to actually consummate an expansion. It would require other governing bodies to authorize that. To agree. For example, a Service Territory that were trying to expand into would need to agree and we would need to receive certification from the California Public Utilities Commission that that expansion is authorized. Are there any reasons why we shouldnt
Review. We reviewed major trends, particularly in the general fund over the past five years. Our source document for this analysis was the citys comprehensive annual financial report. Because the most recent Financial Statement is dated as of june 30th, 2016, the review period is from 11 12 to 15 16. Since fiscal year 1112, revenues have increased from 3 billion to 5. 8 billion and expenditures have increased from 3. 1 billion to 4. 3 billion. We found these actual operating results have been more favorable than projections. I apologize for this chart. Some of the key got cut off. So the blue bars show budgeted revenues, and the red bars show budgeted expenditures. The green lines show actual revenues, and the purple lines show actual expenditures. What this table shows you is actual Fund Revenues have exceeded general Fund Revenues in each of the five years, and actual general Fund Expenditures were lower than budgeted general Fund Expenditures in each of the five years. So this surpl
Our source document for this analysis was the citys comprehensive annual financial report. Because the most recent Financial Statement is dated as of june 30th, 2016, the review period is from 11 12 to 15 16. Since fiscal year 1112, revenues have increased from 3 billion to 5. 8 billion and expenditures have increased from 3. 1 billion to 4. 3 billion. We found these actual operating results have been more favorable than projections. I apologize for this chart. Some of the key got cut off. So the blue bars show budgeted revenues, and the red bars show budgeted expenditures. The green lines show actual revenues, and the purple lines show actual expenditures. What this table shows you is actual Fund Revenues have exceeded general Fund Revenues in each of the five years, and actual general Fund Expenditures were lower than budgeted general Fund Expenditures in each of the five years. So this surplus year to year has provided a boost to the citys reserves. Since the school year 1112, the f
Review. We reviewed major trends, particularly in the general fund over the past five years. Our source document for this analysis was the citys comprehensive annual financial report. Because the most recent Financial Statement is dated as of june 30th, 2016, the review period is from 11 12 to 15 16. Since fiscal year 1112, revenues have increased from 3 billion to 5. 8 billion and expenditures have increased from 3. 1 billion to 4. 3 billion. We found these actual operating results have been more favorable than projections. I apologize for this chart. Some of the key got cut off. So the blue bars show budgeted revenues, and the red bars show budgeted expenditures. The green lines show actual revenues, and the purple lines show actual expenditures. What this table shows you is actual Fund Revenues have exceeded general Fund Revenues in each of the five years, and actual general Fund Expenditures were lower than budgeted general Fund Expenditures in each of the five years. So this surpl
With mayors and other peer cities with similar characteristics to San Francisco. In all, we surveyed eight california counties, six california cities, and nine u. S. Cities. The primary areas of focus for our review included independent analysis and reporting, the twoyear budget cycle, and the timing of the legislative bodies review. We reviewed major trends, particularly in the general fund over the past five years. Our source document for this analysis was the citys comprehensive annual financial report. Because the most recent Financial Statement is dated as of june 30th, 2016, the review period is from 11 12 to 15 16. Since fiscal year 1112, revenues have increased from 3 billion to 5. 8 billion and expenditures have increased from 3. 1 billion to 4. 3 billion. We found these actual operating results have been more favorable than projections. I apologize for this chart. Some of the key got cut off. So the blue bars show budgeted revenues, and the red bars show budgeted expenditures