that was the option you d have walked. and that s whyd i walked at that point my understanding was you were handed an apology that they wanted you to read and i agree with you and is think it took a lot of courage to say no and walk. i i would not have read that either because you re entitledho to your opinion and the whole idea that you have a government agency that is hovering over you and monitoring you is the antithesis of free speech. all right. q one last question. is the artistue is the irony of the government agency five months later found in myum favor on a number of complaints and an ofcom rejected all ofil them and said it would haveng been a chillingem infringement on my free speech,n which it was. was very pleased about u that . we shouldn t have a regulator like that in the uk but they actually found my favor. lastst question has to dol with our bill maher and now i would never refer the queen as an old bag as he b did.e i would be more respectful. i dd say yes, ma am. no