we want to thank the great people of iowa who are going to come together. it s going to happen soon to his remarksto . ai tonight will not air here live censoring democracy to save democracy. democrthat s a new one.join the vix joins prime time. it? think it s worth it? peasants pay for your crimes.ha that s a stupid question. there s no such thing as a a stupidd question, john. just stupi d answers. we got a bunch of dead robots out here, ted. where the global warming go? biden s e vs freeze. plus chris hansen s back. there s something you need to kno.re iw. i m chris hansen. a a win for voters, a loss for lawyers. that s l the headline from iowad democracy is a decided in thee courtroom. it s decided by you, the voter. fothe r the first time in years, the will of the people was crystal clear.ican americans deliver the message without interference from partisan, judgesm and prosecutors. we wrestle democracy awa y from the courts and put it back in the hands of
And i was becoming increasingly concerned that we were damaging we were damaging his legacy. What did the president say in response to what you just described . He said something along the lines of, you know, nobody will care about my legacy if i lose. So that wont matter. Hope hicks revealing that conversation to the january 6th committee. Now she has a chance to add to trumps corrupt legacy. Testifying today in his criminal trial in new york. Also tonight, the political fallout from the Campus Protests and why its time to start focusing again on whats actually happening in gaza. And kristi noem would prefer to let sleeping dogs lie. But sadly, she killed the dog, and now a bunch of lies are being exposed in nomes new book. We begin tonight with a blast from Donald Trumps past. Hope hicks. The former greenwich, connecticut, model turned white house adviser. Hicks, who has not seen trump in nearly two years since she testified about the insurrection her former boss incited, acknowledge
Whether there are grounds for a Criminal Investigation or an ethics investigation against the president of is the United States of america. For example, Rachel Crooks is one of the 16 women that we know of who have come forward. She said that President Trump, before he was president , quote, kissed me directly on the mouth. It was so inappropriate that he thought i was so insignificant he could do that. Jo hart, said he absolutely groped me, and he just lipid his hand there touching my private parts, end quote. These are just two examples of unwelcome sexual advances. I think were he on the subway or in a restaurant would not either or both of these incident be enough to get him arrested . In your experience as the number two most important Law Enforcement officer in the United States, but before you answer that, how about these cases . Kristin anderson in an interview said, quote, the person on my right who unbeknownst to me at the time was donald trump, put their hand up my skirt. He
11 police officers testify against the police. the question is are we going to see witnesses that will deal well, character, the tendencies, the possible bias of the defendants? will the prosecutos be able to bring in witnesses that even those that may be leaning one way can say no, i cannot go if this is the character and tendency of these people, let alone the evidence? the evidence appears to be there from the videotapes. it s the background to the evidence, the lead-up to the evidence, and what jury members bring into that jury box as their own experiences that s going to be decisive. and i m looking to see who is going to testify under what circumstances. hey, rev, before i let you go, i do want to get you on the record here when it comes to voting rights. you and i have talked behind the scenes about how you ve been screaming from the rooftops here when it comes to voting rights, wanting washington to pay more attention to it. they are now, it seems, least
then attended what he hoped to be a victory pattern for hillary clinton. we have a senior doj official with an office that used to be two doors down with yours, meeting with fusion gps, and of course fusion gps was paying for russian dirt on the very person they re supposed to be objectively investigating. then that same senior doj official s wife, the one that met with fusion gps, his wife was on the payroll of fusion gps. then we have a senior investigators assigned to help draft the exoneration letter when we changed the letter to extremely careless? interviewed secretary clinton in an interview i have never seen. i doubt you have either in your career as a prosecutos interviewed mike at flynn, actively involved in the investigation into the trump