Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. About Mollie Tibbetts. The trump organization, according to this indictment, said Michael Cohen pled guilty to lies saying that the money it reimbursed Michael Cohen for paying off Stormy Daniels was legal expenses. Thats a lie. That is dishonest. Thats a violation of law. Isnt that why you hire an attorney. To give them the money so they do it legally and lawfully . Then you list it as paying off somebody for their silence, not as legal expenses. It went to her. She is not a lawyer. He is a lawyer. Is that what mark elias did with the Dossier Money . All those millions of dollars, did that get fully disclosed . No, they were paid to attorneys and those attorneys went and funded this dirty dossier, right . They werent trying to buy anybodys silence . They were trying to by a dirty dossier. Can we be spared the argument that this was done n
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. Incredible. Jason david, has there been equal justice under the law or does it seem lopsided . During the clinton administration, it was richard and the democrats who were screaming that someones personal matters are not an impeachable offense. Here we are now, 20 years later, and its a personal matter that the president was handling and somehow it is not Campaign Violation because he used personal money. If that is their new standard, then lets start the investigation, because did Elizabeth Warren pay lawyers to help her get out of her situation, claiming to be a Native American and to get an advantage at harvard . Or lets go to bernie sanders. Did he pay a lawyer to help his wife get out of trouble in her scandal of trying to raise money after college . Lets go back to Elizabeth Warren. David, heres the difference. Hold on a second. Ther
information would make those things move forward. as a look at this situation, kendall, isn t that a plausible story or scenario? how does that only fall apart in the cohen situation? that s why we can charge the big bucks. clients trust us with confidentiality. they trust us with figuring all this out. campaign finance laws are especially complicated, especially federal campaign find finance laws. i suspect not only did the president have no idea this some might put this on a prosecution radar screen but i doubt michael cohen did. what s being talked about is a federal crime, unsuccessfully raised against john edwards. years ago, discredited as a theory. most people think if he use personal money that goes to some private person in order to deal with personal issues, that s not
as you look at this situation, kendall, isn t that a plausible story or scenario? how does that only fall apart in the cohen situation? that s why we can charge the big bucks. clients trust us with confidentiality. they trust us with figuring all this out. campaign finance laws are especially complicated, especially federal campaign finance laws. i strongly suspect that not only did the president have no idea someone might put this on a prosecution radar screen some day, but i doubt michael cohen did. what s being talked about is a federal crime, unsuccessfully raised against john edwards. you remember that years ago, discredited as a theory. most people think if he use personal money that goes to some private person in order to deal with personal issues, that s not a campaign contribution.