upstairs. friday, friday. have a good show, alex. the very bad news for donald trump is that rudy giuliani has finally, today, learned to talk like a lawyer again. today, for the first time in years, rudy giuliani did not sound like a hallucinating mad man when he walked into the fulton county courthouse in georgia to testify to a grand jury. he did not sound like someone willing to tell any lie for donald trump. he didn t sound like someone ready to take any legal risks for donald trump. not anymore. not now that he has been formally declared a target of the grand jury s criminal investigation of exactly what rudy giuliani did for donald trump in georgia. the rudy giuliani you are about to see is truly shocking now. but it is the way rudy giuliani often handled press questions when he was a federal prosecutor in manhattan in the 19 80s. today, with rudy giuliani clinging to the wreckage of his legal career with his law license suspended, pending possible permanent disb
donald trump. he didn t sound like someone ready to take any legal risks for donald trump. not anymore. not now that he has been formally declared a target of the grand jury s criminal investigation of exactly what rudy giuliani did for donald trump in georgia. the rudy giuliani you are about to see is truly shocking now. but it is the way rudy giuliani often handled press questions when he was a federal prosecutor in manhattan in the 1980s. today, with rudy giuliani clinging to the wreckage of his legal career with his law license suspended, pending possible permanent disbarment, rudy giuliani found his lawyerly voice once again. [inaudible] we ll not talk about this, until the grand jury, and the grand jury s [inaudible] secret. do you believe president trump is the ultimate target of this investigation? i m not going to comment on the grand jury investigation. [inaudible] no more about it. they asked the questions [inaudible] will you be cooperative? you ar
Freedom of information act, supporting affidavits in some of these types of cases. every once in a while, actually with the government s cooperation, we can get access. but it is usually years after a case has finished. and there is no way that the magistrate judge is going to want to jeopardize any ongoing investigations. it may be that the judge reads it in. well, actually, the judge has already seen it might ask the justice department to give him a redacted version, just to see what it might look like. but i think, at the end of the day, it is going to be withheld. we will see eventually. and certainly, the trump people will see, it if anyone is indicted. what do you think the timetable is for the judge making a decision about this? well, i have learned in 30 years of law practice, never to try and predict when a judge will rule. but this is such a high profile matter and it is not really a difficult decision, to be frank so, i imagine we will have a decision very short te
Timetable is for the judge making a decision about this? well, i have learned in 30 years of law practice, never to try and predict when a judge will rule. but this is such a high profile matter and it is not really a difficult decision, to be frank so, i imagine we will have a decision very short term. mark zaid, thank you very much for joining us tonight, really appreciate it. sure, my pleasure. joining us now is democratic congressman eric swalwell, he served as an impeachment manager in the second impeachment trial of donald trump. he is suing donald trump in for his role donald trump s role in inciting the january 6th attack on the capital. thank you very much for joining us tonight. so, when i see this new york times reporting tonight, i am linking it up with that justice department filing, where they said the evidence in the affidavit for the search warrant could involve exposure of other high-profile
Laws passed by congress, that s when trouble arises for the people of this country. that is the big concern, right? as we also see states across the country changing election laws, giving more power to politics and so forth to perhaps overturn the results and in some states, i want to talk about what an election expert said. it wasn t just profoundly anti democratic but potentially criminal. you re attorney general. would your department launch investigations into the people involved in the scheme to over throw election results. we would look at this. this is a high profile matter. we look to see whether or not there should be a full investigation launched in this particular case. again, i think it s i don t know i haven t studied the election changes and with texas