last week. where the court the same five justices who were in the majority here, were were jumping out of their seats trying to overrule roe versus wade. so i think, um, the the the subtext of today s decision is, you know, this law doesn t really this procedure stuff doesn t matter because in a couple months, we are going to get rid of all restrictions on abortion. so, that s that s really where things appear to be heading. and the procedural niceties here will be forgotten by that point. senator davis, could i mean, if what you said is, you know, true about then this basically could impact states ignoring federal laws, ignoring the constitution, and making up their own rules. could you see this decision backfiring on this conservative court, for example, a state like new york passing or some liberal state passing a similar law on gun rights? if there was consistency with these five justices, i could see that this would create a problem.
is, you know, this law doesn t really this procedure stuff doesn t matter because in a couple months, we are going to get rid of all restrictions on abortion. so, that s ti that s really where things appear to be heading. and the procedural niceties here will be forgotten by that point. senator davis, could i mean, if what you said is, you know, true about then this basically could impact states ignoring federal laws, ignoring the constitution, and making up their own rules. could you see this decision backfiring on this conservative court, for example, a state like new york passing or some liberal state passing a similar law on gun rights? if there was consistency with these five justices, i could see that this would create a problem. my concern is when you read this opinion, it is so contorted that i can see them wiggling around it and allowing some sort of