They name. But certainly the former president s team has spent the day bracing for bad news. They appear to believe that this could potentially reference him. That his name could be one of those on those ten indictments that were returned. Theyve issues taken just a few moments ago. Lashing out at the District Attorney, fani willis here. Something that we have seen the former president doing repeatedly on social media in recent days. They are actually accusing them of Election Interference. Which we should note is, of course, ironic given that what the heart of the indictments potentially. Lets go back to cnn sarah murphy who has been outside the courthouse in atlanta all day. Sarah, obviously we are waiting to see when we are going to potentially hear from baku District Attorney, fani willis, that trump has been attacking here. Whats the latest that you have heard . , thats right, i mean, she is still expected to make remarks to the press this evening. But obviously they want to get t
january 6th, 2001, which played out this way after the disputed results in florida. it is the objection in writing and signed by member of the house and a senator? the objection is in writing and i don t care that it is not it is not signed by a member of the senate. the chair will advise that the rules do care. now we all remember what happened next. george w. bush s election was certified by al gore, the vice president at the time and bush was the president. vice president al gore did not stop that. no one suggested he had constitutional authority to do so since, in fact, that was never a thing despite a history of multiple disputed american presidential elections including the one which also hinged on disputed florida results back in 1876 which led to the creation of the elect oral count act. during today s hearing gregory jacob who was lead council to vice president pence was asked if he confronted eastman s interpretation and this is what he said. back in 200
To read it first. to be able to fully understand what they are talking about. it is something that, you know, just based on the information that we do know, i have a lot of questions about it. i certainly have questions about whether this is something that is gonna get moved to federal court. i have read the decision from judge heller denying the removal from manhattan case. and when you read that and you then apply the exact same reasoning to georgia, it seems like a pretty rock solid case to remove. so that is one thing to consider. the other thing to. consider is that a lot of what has been reported, the that fani willis was looking, yet it seems to be outside of her jurisdiction. you know, she is a county district attorney, she does not have jurisdiction in the state house. she does not have jurisdiction in other counties. right now calls to the secretary of state, things like that. that s something that the attorney general of the state of georgia is one who always
Transparency and i reiterate my support for the similar release of the minority s memo once it s scrubbed of all intelligence sources and methods. adam schiff had a phone conference with reporters about what would happen, when this memo comes out. here s what he said. it will have to go to the white house and the president in theory could veto its release, in that case the house would have to override that veto. i think the president would be hard-pressed to try to suppress this memo, particularly since they claim they re releasing the gop memo in interest of transparency. shepard, sometimes you don t like what you see. back to you. shepard: sometimes you tonight get the whole picture like today. good to see you. the republican memo a big topic
Which barely mentioned carter page, a small fraction of the dossier, that that was the primary basis for getting this warrant. again, maybe true. but i have questions. shepard: four separate fisa judges signed off on it. every six months you have to sign off. what has happened, they have seen something. it s not like they re acting in a vacuum. it began with agents saying connections with russians. every six months to get to surveil him again, another judge signed off on it. it was four separate judges. and to add to that, you can t take the old fisa only case. shepard: you have to have new stuff. say it was good enough before. supposedly in the past 90 days, you ve done surveillance. you have to show fruits from that to get it.