Testimony? yeah, i mean he has been shrouded in mystery for a long time. in general, you want to stay that way if you are a possible defendant. you don t want to give prosecutors a shot at you. you don t want to have to tell your story and fix it. what stood out to me, boris is the account of the january 2nd phone call. he gave a credible account that in the main after the election, he was doing chief of staff sort of duties, but that phone call, and the preface to it where he basically joined with trump to pressure raffensperger, that was the hardest part to justify in order to get removal and the hardest part to say that i was acting under my federal office, and that s, i think that is the linchpin of judge jones ruling when it comes to in ten days, and jones himself said it is an
Counting on the fact that maybe they re not ready. these folks are probably ready to go. yeah. and while the georgia case is unfolding, the special counsel election interference case is set to hold a hearing monday regarding mark meadows, his efforts to move the fulton county case against him to federal court, if i have that correct. georgia secretary of state brad raffensperger has been subpoenaed to testify. what do you expect to happen? meadows has at least a colorful argument because he was chief of staff at the time. the important thing i think to remember for our viewers is that removal s not a defense, it just takes the same case, puts it in federal court. same prosecution, same charges, same theory. it will cause some delay which, again, is part of the tactic. i think the problem for meadows is the same problem he has in the prosecution. he can say i ll just be the chief of staff arranging phone calls. the problem is, you re outside the orbit of what you normally would do l