is very closely held by congress, medicare, the ability to do so so is it just the whole point, jeffrey, if you re saying, i won t enforce it, you couldn t anyway. it s just bravado that s right although the question is, he has they have threatened fines on businesses and certain institutions that insist on mandates internally and the question is, will they try to fine the hospitals that comply with the federal government? that would create a direct conflict but i think florida loses in that case, because, you know, the law seems pretty clear that, you know, he who pays the piper calls the tune. if the federal government can insist that if you take their money, you better wear you better have a mask mandate, i don t think florida has any right to interfere with that. i think it s the preemptionary
leave anyway. they have no ability to enforce because the power of the purse is very closely held by congress, medicare, the ability to do so so is it just the whole point, jeffrey, if you re saying, i won t enforce it, you couldn t anyway. it s just bravado that s right although the question is, he has they have threatened fines on businesses and certain institutions that insist on mandates internally and the question is, will they try to fine the hospitals that comply with the federal government? that would create a direct conflict but i think florida loses in that case, because, you know, the law seems pretty clear that, you know, he who pays the piper calls the tune. if the federal government can insist that if you take their money, you better wear you better have a mask mandate, i don t think florida has any right to interfere with that. i think it s the preemptionary of the law, federal supremacy so