Enumerated in the constitution to the federal government are reserved to the states. you read this draft opinion. the supreme court is saying it s none of our business, it s the business of democracy where the people elect representatives who express their views with laws and policies. it would revert back to pre-1973. if people want a right to abortion they can convince the u.s. congress to pass a law. but they never had the votes there. so put different people into office. elect different people. or they can get state legislatures to pass the laws they want either pro viergd a right to the abortion or banning a restricted abortion. it s as simple as that.
Enumerated in the constitution to the federal government are reserved to the states. you read this draft opinion. the supreme court is saying it s none of our business, it s the business of democracy where the people elect representatives who express their views with laws and policies. it would revert back to pre-1973. if people want a right to abortion they can convince the u.s. congress to pass a law. but they never had the votes there. so put different people into office. elect different people. or they can get state legislatures to pass the laws they want either pro viergd a right to the abortion or banning a restricted abortion. it s as simple as that.
Enumerated in the constitution to the federal government are reserved to the states. you read this draft opinion. the supreme court is saying it s none of our business, it s the business of democracy where the people elect representatives who express their views with laws and policies. it would revert back to pre-1973. if people want a right to abortion they can convince the u.s. congress to pass a law. but they never had the votes there. so put different people into office. elect different people. or they can get state legislatures to pass the laws they want either pro viergd a right to the abortion or banning a restricted abortion. it s as simple as that.