to change these things is by focusing on these issues in elections and making sure that we understand that our fundamental right, our fundamental right to live, to exist in public squares, is what s at stake with these cases. let me ask you quickly, because you brought it up. the supreme court that will be making the first major ruling in the battle over gun control in over a decade, it will determine if this new york law that imposes strict limits on carrying guns outside the home, if that violates the second amendment. quickly, the significance of this and the precedence it sets, if the judges strike down that law is what? it s a huge, huge potential precedent here, alex. we have never had a riot that has been recognized in the constitution to carry a gun anywhere, at any time, for any reason. this case, the question before this case is whether the supreme court will overturn new york s permitting system and basically overturn many state s permitting systems that are similar, tha
games. the second amendment to the constitution limits wa we can do about guns. so the details matter to me. i m going to be skeptical of any of these proposals and examine them in light of the second amendment to the constitution. so reading between the lines, you re more inclined to be supportive of the immigration efforts, less inclined to be support i have of some of these gun control measures? yes. fair enough. i want to go to recess appointments. i know you have called for, you believe there should be the immediate resignation of the labor relations board members in the recess appointments that the president made. i want to ask you about the ruling itself. it was much broader than the lawsuit you guys brought. was it too broad? it was a breathtaking decision. it basically said what the president and the congress have been doing since about 1867 is unconstitutional. and what it really says is. that s scary, by the way. no, it s not. that a court is saying this. that