fundamental shift but also e-r reñú implications of a rulinguvú2-ix thiìc% thiìc% åhs added this caveat,ç7 it remainso be seen what exactlyz:n supr court doesem rule,e victor. !wigp jdtq) q,pecting tocñpz son kaitly.n rpeaking in0 because she s in theqfñ roomórs waiting for the president, to talk aboute4)+ñ javelin missile going to ukraine. c here he comesñe: now. we ll get to hisñe remarks. let s bring in cnnybñdw?z repor ariane de vogue. this draft opinion irñ+ hi d eñ how supreme court. it s a thelu[most 45 called6u[m stare nhrar]ah9%w;wyo÷ó[l covi@)+b; te 6!gwl justice sonia7ódm sotomay pushing back, why arew9t7aú we suddenly now reversing roe v. wade3añd orq years. she said some peoplue to say it s because we veatipñe suddenly had an ?z2dinflux of conservatives appointed to the court. i have to jump inñod, here.u i have to jump inñod, here.u we re going to back ) alabama, presiderçiñwviñwvyñ7rg -k a lou plant. @tñ: me, andd make a2ynpst�
decisions relating to your private life, who you marry, whether or not you decide to conceive a child or not, whether or not you can have an abortion, a range of other decisions, how you raise your child, what does this do? does this mean that in florida, they can decide they re going to pass a law saying that same-sex marriage is not permissible, against the law in florida? there s a it s a fundamental shift in american jurisprudence. politico obtained and published a leaked draft opinion written by conservative justice samuel alito. now, the opinion would eliminate the constitutionally protected right to abortion. alito writes this in part. the constitution makes no reference to abortion and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision. roe was egregiously wrong from the start. the supreme court chief justice john roberts confirmed the leaked draft is authentic but he cautioned that it is not final. roberts slammed the leak as a betrayal and a s