About mexico, here is President Trump announcing the cancellation of his meeting with the mexican president in philadelphia today. The president of mexico and myself have agreed to cancel our planned meeting scheduled for next week. Unless mexico is going to treat the United States fairly, with respect, such a meeting would be fruitless and i want to go a different route. We have no choice. So david, was this sort of a mutual agreement, a mutual cancellation, or do you think that the mexican president pulled the plug . I think that the mexican president pulled the plug, and he did that because donald trump frankly put him in a corner. He kept in a tweet sort of pushing mexico saying you know you have to pay for the wall. I think nieto has to worry about his own political audience, mexicans were outraged, angry at
him for months, if we talk this way to china, chinese are not going to stand for china backing down. This is very different from a Business Deal where youre bluffing. Foreign
deals. they know what happened. they were central to those decisions. that s why they re of interest to the prosecutors. ellie, what happens if you don t show up for a subpoena? what s going on here with don jr. and ivanka trying to squash this, a, and, b, if they don t successfully do that, can they just not show in. they re in court trying to quash the subpoena. it is difficult to quash a subpoena, but i want to say this, the trump s argument here is not absurd. it is not ridiculous. the crux of their argument is we have been politicly targeted by this attorney general, letitia james. you know what? they re right. it is not a matter of opinion or speculation. that s a matter of fact. letitia james herself said it over and over again when she was running for attorney general of new york. she said, essentially, the main plank of her platform was vote for me, and i ll nail the trumps. i object to that. i don t think any prosecutor, republican or democrat, should ever run for office
the truth is no longer politicly advantageous but it s disappointing to say the least. what do you mean by that? i mean, you know, i think that well, accountability for me for january 6th, again, i look at that day on two different levels. i look at it on a micro level and i see, you know, political rhetoric, potential over actions by our elected leaders that resulted in the events of january 6th. i also see the failures of law enforcement, leadership, i see gross negligence on their part when it comes to the preparedness, preparation for that day, which resulted in
the well, look, this is a political response to what was a politic move by nancy pelosi who wasn t going to take a vote because she doesn t want to give republicans subpoena power and that this would give them subpoena power. and she doesn t want to give her members a tough vote to take if it is going to be tough for some of them. but this document is not a let s get to yes document. let s find a way where we can work this out document. this is a politic document which says that not only is this unconstitutional, but you ve been trying to get rid of the president since the day he was elected document. and so this is very strong politicly but levelly i m not a lawyer but how much of being impeached depends on the willingness to go along with being impeached. this is the following the example of richard nixon, the house it trying to put the house between a rock and hard place. either trump has to produce the witnesses an keep in mind just
opinion? i i happen to, yes. sean: also tonight, congressman al green is now planning to force a house vote on donald trump s impeachment. for what, who knows. and pelosi seems to have a real, real thin grasp on her own party. let not your hearts be troubled, though. democrats have attempted to impeach every single republican president since ronald reagan. on the one hand, you have the radical extreme far left democratic socialists demanding donald trump s impeachment for no reason whatsoever. and on the other, nancy pelosi, why the divide. does the speaker think it s a bad move politicly? it will hurt them in 2020? is pelosi trying to obfuscate?