now, identification could take a while, why? remains is suggestive of a degree of decomposition, and authorities have said it seems that what was found and who may have been found have been there a while. now, the probabilities are that human remains found near brian laundrie s belongings will be brian laundrie but we re going to have to wait and see. in terms of what we know, the remains were found in the carlton reserve. western florida, investigators have been searching there for more than a month. the fbi says the area where they were found was underwater until recently. is that true? and if so is that why the discovery wasn t found sooner. were they even searching in this place before? clouding the discovery is the fact that brian laundrie s parents were there today when the discoveries were made. is that a coincidence? well, they were with authorities when the discoveries were made, and the parents didn t discover the actual remains so there were authorities there wit
and they are not getting that. what they re getting is the complete opposite. they re getting a party, which is the minority party in the country actually running the show. holding back the vote on voting rights. i agree. i think it will be the hill they die on. well, look, we don t know but i ll tell you what, it would have been the fight i would have focused on. yeah. and look, i hear the counter arguments. it s all ruby red states passing the laws. whatever. you re closing out opportunity for yourself and allowing a pattern to emerge and you had to stake your currency on something but i will ask you this, don. yes, sir. i agree with you about the urgency of this issue and yet, we don t see it reflected in the top reason poll in that race in virginia. they said economy, they said schools and education and they said covid. yeah. are we off? no. because that s everything that look. that s everything that is supposedly, right, that not supposedly, that s
democrats get whipped in the midterms, not making federalized voting rights and those protections the hill to die on for them, i think, may come back to haunt them. harry enten, thank you very much. appreciate you. be sure to check out harry s podcast margins of error. very popular but how could it not be? thank you for watching. don lemon tonight with its big star. not just the hill to die on. it will be the hill they die on. it will be the hill the democratic party dies on because that s what voters want. the voters who pushed this president into office. black and brown voters. black and latino voters, women. they want voting rights. they want access equal access, not special access equal access to the voting booth. and they are not getting that now. what they are getting is the complete opposite. they are getting a party, which is the minority party in the country, actually running the show. holding back the vote on voting rights. so i i think it will be the hi
office. does that matter? yes. why? two arguments. legally there is zero precedent for a former president getting such protection from their own issuance, from their own issuance, meaning they say, as a former president, i want to exercise this privilege. now, there s a distinction to be made i ll get to in a second. but no precedent of the law recognizing a former president being able to do this. the closest thing to a case on point is what happened in the supreme court against nixon. and that case rejects the idea. why? the privilege belongs to the presidency, which is an office. it does not attach to the person in the office add inif i night m, meaning forever. second we know this not just as a matter of law but as a matter of practice because to the distinction i mentioned earlier, former presidents have asked sitting presidents to exercise the privilege on their behalf to protect particularly communications or documents. that means in no small irony it is up to president
scrutiny by the january 6th commission is being reported as if it is a legitimate option. it should not be. and here is why. the facts. trump sent a letter to the national archives today asking to withhold about 40 documents the committee wants citing executive privilege. now, does that exist? yes. a sitting president has that privilege. the key is sitting. trump is obviously out of office. does that matter? yes. why? two arguments. legally there is zero precedent for a former president getting such protection from their own issuance, from their own issuance, meaning they say, as a former president, i want to exercise this privilege. now, there s a distinction to be made i ll get to in a second. but no precedent of the law recognizing a former president being able to do this. the closest thing to a case on point is what happened in the supreme court against nixon. and that case rejects the idea. why? the privilege belongs to the presidency, which is an office. it does not att