when asked what president he would put on mount rushmore, herman cain hinted, it would be himself. i don t know about you, but i don t want to hear the words herman cain and mount in the same sentence. and people of italy looking to replace silvio berlusconi, you need someone with proven business experience to take care of the challenging issues as well as taking on with berlusconi sexual antics, italy needs herman cain. he knows a lot about italy, and a lot about pizza. about pizza, yes. and folks, the harassment allegations keep coming at herman cain like an uninvited hand up a pleated skirt. and cain is not afraid to point out what is really behind these charges. a businessman by the name of herman cain stepped forward and that is one thing that the
throughout the trial jackson supporters have gathered outside the building offers words of encouragement to jackson s family. today la toya thanked them. her joy at the verdict unmistakable. michael loves everybody out here. we all love them. and guess what? he was in that courtroom, and that s why victory was served. jermaine jackson spoke briefly as he left the courthouse. justice was served, yes. it wasn t enough time, though. what do you say for michael? michael s with us. michael s with us. jackson s mother and father, joe and katherine, were cheered as they made their way through the crowd. this is the verdict the jacksons were hoping for. but prosecutor david walgren said that many people must have been thinks for the jacksons today, the verdict isn t an end to the story. our sympathies go out to the jackson family at this time for their loss that they have suffered. not a pop icon, but a son and brother, and i think that s the most important to keep in m
the building offering words of encouragement to the jackson family. today latoya thanked them. her joy at the verdict unmistakable. michael loves everybody out here. we all love them. and guess what? he was in that courtroom, and that s why victory was served. jermaine jackson spoke briefly as he left the courthouse. justice was served, yes. it wasn t enough time, though. what do you say for michael? michael s with us. michael s with us. jackson s mother and father, joe and katherine, were cheered as they made their way through the crowd. this is the verdict the jacksons were hoping for. but prosecutor david walgren said that many people must have been thinks for the jacksons today, the verdict isn t an end to the story. our sympathies go out to the jackson family at this time for their loss that they have suffered. not a pop icon, but a son and a brother. and i think that s most important to keep in mind today. a son, a brother and also, of course a father. p
defendant, conrad robert murray, guilty of the crime of involuntary manslaughter in violation of penal code section 192 subsection b. alleged victim michael joseph jackson. as you just saw, dr. murray showing no emotion as the verdict was read, but outside the courthouse jackson fans erupted. throughout the trial jackson supporters have gathered outside the building offering words of encouragement to the jackson family. today latoya thanked them. her joy at the verdict unmistakable. michael loves everybody out here. we all love them. and guess what? he was in that courtroom, and that s why victory was served. jermaine jackson spoke briefly as he left the courthouse. justice was served, yes. it wasn t enough time, though. what do you say for michael? michael s with us. michael s with us. jackson s mother and father, joe and katherine, were cheered as they made their way through the crowd. this is the verdict the jacksons were hoping for. but prosecutor david walg
interesting that the highlighters were requested but no questions. i thought that perhaps it came from the fact that in california and in this case the jurors were allowed to take notes. so, rather than come back into the courtroom and ask for read-back of testimony, which was sort of the practice when i was practicing law in washington, d.c., as a prosecutor, perhaps they needed the highlighters to remind themselves of the most powerful evidence that came in front of them or perhaps to go through those jury instructions. remember, there s only one count here, involuntary manslaughter, but the jury instructions were actually quite kmrefl. that is because this case is much more of a medical malpractice type case rather than sort of the typical hom stied that we all see on csi and that sort of thing, homicide by gun, by knife. so perhaps they needed it to weed through the elements that were outlined in the jury instructions, which again were pretty complicated. reporter: le