boundaries and at the same time we re not moving into ukraine as far as nato. it seems we re all playing semantics games, give us a guarantee and we re not going to give you a guarantee on something we re not going to do anyway. that s what s so ridiculous about this. we re not going to formalize it but we re not going to do it. the real question is, what is this about? it s silly to say there was a breakthrough yesterday, you don t have breakthroughs on day one. you don t have russians saying we re not going into ukraine. as brought up by willie, they re at 100,000, supposed to be 150,000 at this point. not massive breakthroughs but at the same time it could have gone much worse yesterday. could have. i think the administration s done a very good job at signaling what would be the direct and indirect costs economically, militarily, strategically, of russia acting.
come to the capitol that were supposed to be counted. so, yeah, that is a coup. it is just like, you know, i m seeing, peter baker, it has been fascinating watch these republicans who have followed up with mitch mcconnell, who talked about the insurrection, saying, oh, it is not an insurrection, it is a riot or, you know, it is not an insurrection, that s the wrong thing to say about it, despite the fact some have actually called it, i think properly so, a terror attack. everybody s playing semantics games, games with words basically. it is what they re doing. when you have people charged with sedition for planning to overthrow the government and, you know, gun supplies stocked up on the other side of the river, former military people planning this all out, this is sedition. i don t know why it is so hard