course the pernicious part. when you ask somebody do you think you should have a to show an i.d. to vote? yeah, that sounds good. but you re not discussing what it takes to get that i.d. and who has them and who doesn t, and why they don t have them. that is where the truth lies. i try to explain that to people all the time wh. what is accepted as i.d. i m glad he said that. if you have license to carry, that card, you can do it, but if you re a student, your i.d. doesn t work or you know, an ebt card. public assistance. i wonder who has public assistance cards. you know who has public assistance cards, poor people. white and black. and i think you have to look as you said into the intent, and you have to do your research. people say that all the time. why shouldn t you have to show an i.d. do the research and figure out what kinds of people historically don t have i.d.s or who tend not to have i.d.s as to
the rest of the population, and so you got to lack at all of those things and not just at the surface as you said. ask a question or you know, summary question like oh, my gosh, yeah, of course everyone s going to say yes until you actually get down to the nitty-gritty and they know exactly what they re doing. is it racist? it is racist. when you know that that s what you re up against that they are willing to do anything to get power back and you re going to fight with each other? mm-hmm. and now look, i know people on the left will say, oh, stop, stop saig the democrats are fighting with each other. no, they re not, it s just joe man manchin. that s not true. biden met with a whole bunch of house members today. you just had a house member say i half the progressives won t vote for the infrastructure bill on monday if it s not with the reconciliation bill. they have real problems. they ve got to get it straight or they ll lose. i agree with you on the larger part again as we s
department, what an executive is supposed to do is accomplish the goal, right? the appropriation but not spend as much as necessary. i mean if you can accomplish something and save. so i think let s take an aircraft carrier, let s say. $40 billion for an aircraft carrier. if you can get that aircraft carrier for $35 billion, you now have $5 billion left over. at the end of the day, could you sweep up enough money to use that without [ overlapping voices ] that s the legal question. the lie here is that there s actually a national security reason to any combatants. let s be clear about this. this is the pernicious part. the people who are coming across the mexican border are mostly not mexicans. they re people from central american, desperately poor and brutalized in large measure because of american policies that led to extreme violence in countries like honduras, nicaragua, el salvador, who are
that s the legal question. the lie here is that there s actually a national security reason to any combatants. let s be clear about this. this is the pernicious part. the people who are coming across the mexican border are mostly not mexicans. they re people from central american, desperately poor and brutalized in large measure because of american policies that led to extreme violence in countries like honduras, nicaragua, el salvador, who are fleeing for their lives, right? those are the people who donald trump is calling a threat to the united states, a military threat. he is sort of in order to get it to the military, he s saying enemy combatants, which i don t know that he s used that term before. that s implying that it s members of the taliban or al qaeda who are pouring over the border. i don t know what the books at trump org look like but you don t shuffle a little money