lucas pom tom lynnson at the white house tomlinson, and virginia republican lieutenant governor winsome sears. welcome, everybody, i m neil cavuto and happy weekend. so far a happy and, thus far, calm weekend after the supreme court s historic 6-3 decision to essentially gut roe v. wade. let s go to alexandria hoff at the supreme court with how things are looking there. reporter: hi, neil. yeah, a few more protesters have arrived over past hour, several dozen now with chants breaking out. but this time yesterday, neil, when that decision came down, the most immediate and audible reaction came from the pro-life side. there were cheers and tears for what they saw as the recognition of life before birth, something they d been waiting over 50 # years to do. and as the department of homeland security warned of a night of rage, things did remain mostly calm. an american flag was burning here in d.c., similar symbolic symbolic of the anger after the court did undo roe v. wade.
It s not a crime for the mother, it s a crime for the person who do it, aid or abet or solicit it. we know an oklahoma woman if she wants to have an abortion, she can go to colorado, anywhere else, any other states that permit it, but we re celebrating, neil, the fact that for about three weeks, oklahoma s been abortion-free for the first time since 1973. neil: so if there are any doctors or clinics or agencies that worked at even now to offer women abortions, they re technically breaking the law and they could they could be leading a crime? that s right, it s not a technical violation, it is a violation. it s a felony and they re open to civil penalties and we have a texas style private right of civil enforcement. anybody in oklahoma could sue that doctor for financial
and there s nothing good around turn around barry i finally found the right snack shepard: 15 minutes past the hour. 16 now. president obama steps up his push for military action against syria, still unclear whether congress will side with him. today the numbers aren t looking good. either way there are a number of major legal issues surrounding this crisis. judge andrew napolitano is live. the first is this is illegal. it s illegal because the international law not talking about the u.s. constitution or american federal law. international law does not prohibit it. you can shepard: permit it. does not permit it. you can attack another country if they attacked you, about to attack you and their attack is, quote, dangerously imminent. if the other country has been attacked and ask you to come to
Marriage to continue knowing that the decision is confined to california. so the question is will the supreme court take it or not? we just don t know the answer. but andrea, if it does, it would probably hear the case probably next spring and it might be the same term in which the court agrees to hear a challenge to the defense of marriage act, the federal law that bars recognition of same-sex marriage in those states that permit it. so the bottom line is if the backers don t request the supreme court to hear it and if the supreme court doesn t hear it, there is a possibility that the ban on prop 8 being implemented will stand at least for a year and it could be even longer that the california ban on prop 8 being implemented i would say it a little differently. yeah, i think you can count on the backer of prop 8 appealing this to the supreme court. okay. so the ban will stay in effect until the supreme court decides it either will not take