issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest
We ve seen in the last several years is mostly a decline among republicans. and i think you can trace it, really, to september 2020. at the height of the campaign when then president trump started to attack the military, attack his own generals, and criticize them. that created sort of a permission space for republicans to look at the military in a different way, that s been echoed by other media personalities and other political leaders. now we ve got this crazy phenomenon where the uniformed military is being treated like it s a combatant in the culture war. this politicizes the military and over time can cause a decline in confidence. and so is that what you re describing at the root of the recruitment problems that are being felt by all branches of the service? no, the recruitment problems are first and foremost a function of labor economics. there s great jobs available in