into e mails and staff movements are much less than sue gray, it is harderfor the police. because a summary offence is not massively serious and you could argue to ask for people s e mails would not be proportionate. partly they needed to wait for sue gray to garret the evidence but then also at the commissioner spilled out some of the reasons why they might have specifically gone for this investigation retrospectively come were people breaching rules they really knew they were breaching and obviously this is the place that made the rules so that is at really quite straightforward reason. is there an issue around public trust involved? clearly if people are preaching these rules and if people are saying if they are breaking the rules that i don t have to. it s a combination of the evidence already gathered in these very specific reasons why you might look at these