happy monday. oh, thank you. thank you. please. we ve justjust han your gifts or to the archer. so when the presidents of harvard, mit and the university of pennsylvaniay are exposed as dumb and dumber and dumbest, it s a great day for all of us. in case you missed it, these three leading edge crats were grilled like bratwurst at a tailgate by congress last weekst on the issue of . specifically calling for the of jews. e does that constitute bullying? harassmenlyint? i if it is directed and severe or pervasive, it and is harassmn . so the answer is yes. it is swa context dependent g decision. calling for the of jews does notenocid constitute bullyn harassment. i have not heard calling for the t. for jews on our campus. but you ve heard chants for intifada. ve heard chants which can be anti-semitic dependin ig on the context. at harvard, does calling for the of jews violate harvard sf rules of bullying and harassment? yes. orjeualify no? it can be , depend
officials from the pennsylvaniay where he was convicted on sexual assault charges. he was freed after the pennsylvania supreme court ruled prosecutors should have abided by a deal made by their predecessors made in 2005. there is an agreement where if he cooperated in a civil case, he would not be criminally charged. he served three years of a potential ten, he is not yet publicly indicated whether he will take any action against those who prosecuted him, simply saying in a statement, i ve never changed my stance nor my story here and always maintained my innocence. pennsylvania governor tom wolf recently included it in his budget a proposal to pay anyone wrongly convicted $50,000 for each year they were held behind the bars. the court decision to free him was not based on innocence but