steep the sun will be blocked as it moves across the sky the neighbors behind you yap of two many times the capitalization of one floor addition will have a significant shadowy understand the project sponsor has agreed and i assume as part of the case report to make 9 second floor even with the dr requesters building mr. lindsey. that plan has not been simpleminded. we ll have to take dr but i want to say the architect present of yeah. hi dr requesters have talked about the phelps of the building it has no real significant impact either way although they get a little bit of a separation between their yards and the one story addition but there is a structural reason why that is different to do maybe you could explain that. it has to it - nooechlz a steven it has a lot to do with the water that anything rats through the hill it has been augmented when the client bought the building a wall was placed through there but it runs to the year a lot of times there s active water
guidelines noting the project sponsor is taking steps required by dbi to legalize and correct the rear deck and stairs to grade originally built almost thirty years ago the rear stairs proposed are loud as a permit obstruction within the planning code and the stairs are proposed to be legalized of the dr requester they ask you not take dr. approve it that concludes my presentation. dr requester our team has 10 men s. thank you for your stamina can those be sdrntd i m to take the rear stairs which is 48 and second will be the first one i m picking up i paul cox a civil engineer and i represent the dr requester rear stair issue i ll be bring to your attention the items and that 3 of which will require our considerations and mention two other items that are action items handled by the building inspection. can you speak into the microphone. it s on one. okay. thank you. there you go. go ahead. can i precede first just to make sure we re oriented correctly this w
thank you. project sponsor you have two minutes. thank you i want to point out that the grade between those two buildings that was mentioned by the project sponsor is only been measured from the rear yard he didn t mention there s a difference of two feet so the impact of the higher building is really again much less than presented i can show you the additional shadows this is a view of the area this shows the shadows how long how long they re coming from the south and east they re coming from this area they re already blocking that area and again, we are expending out to the same legislated that the adjacent properties all right. are i appreciate our time but no reason to find exemplary and extraordinary circumstances if you wish the architects are here. with that, the public portion is closed. commissioner antonini. yeah. i visited the site yesterday and got a a chance it was overcast but i would doubt the impact of the property building could have much of a eff
has the doris messengers in there although their mentioned as a possible compromise it didn t seem looets at least i don t feel they have an impact for remove that s my motion to leave them in there. that motion has been second on commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore no commissioner johnck s san francisco commissioner fong and no. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes that passes 5 to 2 it places you on the next item at 2655 street those are requests for discretionary review although the addressed are the same there are on two separate this by the same person my recommendation we call them together and provide their time of totally of 10 minutes. for both the dr requester and the sponsor. that s correct. i m not sure i understand that but. are you the dr requester. i m representing them. your representing the dr requester you ll have 10 maintenance total. i have a power point overwhelming to be presenting.
the compromising line of the rear walls. letting take a look at it. this is some of the contenti contention. why don t we. it s okay if i look at sheet 82.5 you re looking at the second story proposed the matter of the bedroom you as you can see the orange or the color shading on the left-hand side of that room that would be would be removed from the project sthits not part of the official plans so if you re wishing to do that you need to take dr to do that. okay. thank you. it s actual volume building volume. i m interested just to hear mr. butler acknowledging there is a compromise together with the combination of drawings other than shifting the building which is not discussed. i went to the department and copied this in july it was submitted as a revision to the preapplication it shows the rear walls the uphill to the south and the proposed addition are now at the same depth relative to the front property line the preapplication drawing showed the 2 1/2 fe