about how risky it might be. i ve been to those meetings, i speak from experience. the world has moved forward around them and the reason to divest in momentum to do them have grown spectacularly. the reasons that i think motivate it had board of supervisors to vote was the reality of climate change and the scientific news keeps getting more terrible in the 20 months since you vote. we re now in a race to save the world from the worst case scenario frs climate change divest ment as this retirement board was asked to do. another aspect that s change td since april of 2013 is the new energy landscape. even a few years ago it s here. renewable cheap energy is seriously impacking traditional power generation an power companies. in the u.s. coke brothers i could go on about that. the third is the carbon bubble. more and more authority, the bank of london, the british financial minister say wez re in the midst of a carbon bubble that could plummet and make the retirement board
spoke to the board and made some very wonderful presentations. she didn t show so i think she has a lot of explaining to do. i very much would support this motion to have her come to the board and answer these questions. before the next speaker comes up, i m going to reminds everyone this is about wendy paskin-jordan so just please keep your comments related to her reappointment, but not about in general what the retirement board can or should not do. thank you. next speaker, please. i ve been a san francisco voter since 1908 and am the city of somebody who will have a city pension in a few years an i know he agrees with me in all this. i want to thank you for your unanimous vote to ask the pension board to invest in the fossil fuels. that was such a different time. during the nearly two years since that spring 2012 vote the retirement board has done little but waffle and mumble about how risky it might be. i ve been to those meetings, i speak from experience. the world h
that was such a different time. during the nearly two years since that spring 2012 vote the retirement board has done little but waffle and mumble about how risky it might be. i ve been to those meetings, i speak from experience. the world has moved forward around them and the reason to divest in momentum to do them have grown spectacularly. the reasons that i think motivate it had board of supervisors to vote was the reality of climate change and the scientific news keeps getting more terrible in the 20 months since you vote. we re now in a race to save the world from the worst case scenario frs climate change divest ment as this retirement board was asked to do. another aspect that s change td since april of 2013 is the new energy landscape. even a few years ago it s here. renewable cheap energy is seriously impacking traditional power generation an power companies. in the u.s. coke brothers i could go on about that. the third is the carbon bubble. more and more authori
retirement board was asked to do. another aspect that s change td since april of 2013 is the new energy landscape. even a few years ago it s here. renewable cheap energy is seriously impacking traditional power generation an power companies. in the u.s. coke brothers i could go on about that. the third is the carbon bubble. more and more authority, the bank of london, the british financial minister say wez re in the midst of a carbon bubble that could plummet and make the retirement board has to the tune of i think $3500 million that s worthless. so let s catch up. thank you. thank you for your public comment. that ng you. and again, i m dpoing to have to remind everyone that your public comments must be confined to this item which is about wendy paskin-jordan s reappointment. please continue your comments in relation to these items or else we will have to sprupt you. interrupt you. thank you very much. my name is brett, i m senior analyst at 350.org. my job is to tra
td since april of 2013 is the new energy landscape. even a few years ago it s here. renewable cheap energy is seriously impacking traditional power generation an power companies. in the u.s. coke brothers i could go on about that. the third is the carbon bubble. more and more authority, the bank of london, the british financial minister say wez re in the midst of a carbon bubble that could plummet and make the retirement board has to the tune of i think $3500 million that s worthless. so let s catch up. thank you. thank you for your public comment. that ng you. and again, i m dpoing to have to remind everyone that your public comments must be confined to this item which is about wendy paskin-jordan s reappointment. please continue your comments in relation to these items or else we will have to sprupt you. interrupt you. thank you very much. my name is brett, i m senior analyst at 350.org. my job is to track public institutions reaction and due diligence to what is no