we continue to follow the developments coming in this hour. we are getting more of the firsthand look at the dangerous situation still unfolding on the ground throughout israel and gaza. and now three days after the massive terrorist attack by hamas on israeli civilians. this is new, a number of suspects who infiltrated from israel into lebanon were killed and the idf soldiers are raining down missiles on gaza as well as airstrikes pounding, pounding the city of gaza this morning. our teams have seen the israeli troops and armor moving towards gaza border. cnn s clarissa ward and the team were near that border, and they had to take cover in a ditch as the rockets flew overhead. i will tell you have to take shelter. ok okay. go! yeah. yeah. okay. get down. close, close, close. you re fine. you re fine. you re fine. you re fine. you are okay. you are all right. you are all right. okay. you are okay. all right. yeah. guys? are you seeing our situation, guys?
taxpayer dollars on an illegitimate impeachment inquiry because donald trump, the puppet master, has directed extreme maga republicans to launch a political hit job against president joe biden. that s house minority leader hakeem jeffries calling out republicans in the lower chamber before the vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry into president joe biden. that came after hunter biden defied a subpoena from house republicans challenging them to hold public hearings for his testimony. we ll have much, much more from a bitter and partisan day on capitol hill. plus, the supreme court will hear the first case tied to abortion rights since it overturned roe v. wade. we ll get expert legal analysis on that just ahead. good morning and welcome to way too early on this thursday, december 14th. i m jonathan lemire. thanks for starting your day with us. we have a busy morning ahead, and we ll start here. the republican controlled house has voted to formally authorize its impea
many of those lies are well documented. we know that mr. santos hide about his education, both graduate and post graduate. claiming that he attended universities where he was never enrolled. claiming that he obtained degrees that he did not earn. we know that mr. santos lied about his employment when he claimed that he worked for two prestigious financial institutions, citi group and goldman sachs. we know that mr. santos lied about his religious faith, when he said he was jewish, and when called out meant to say that he was jew-ish. and we know he lied when he said four employees killed in a mass shooting in florida. mr. speaker, while troubling, those lies did not justify his removal from this body. but these and other misleading statements reflect directly on mr. santos s credibility. in may, mr. speaker. george santos said that he looked forward to seeing the ethics process play out. and that if the committee finds reason to remove them, then that is the process. today, m
squeaker which side prevails. so whether it is saccone by two or conor lamb by two matters less than it is a four point margin or whatever it ends up. even if the democrats looses, if it is close, the democrats are going to claim it is a sign. difficult for them to claim it is a success story even if saccone victory. psychologically, there is a different impact especially for republican members. tomorrow morning if the republicans were to gather for their conference meeting and if they have lost this seat, there will be a different feeling inside the room about concern and panic for what november brings. the difference psychologically for republicans tomorrow morning is different than if they loose. republicans have poured a lot
of money into this. yeah. through pacs and the rnc has put a million dollars into it, if they lose this seat, alarm bells going off. and more republicans deciding to call it quits and retire. saying this environment is tough for me if i am in a sub
A news and interview program, anchored by Erin Burnett.
client, the president, sit down with the special counsel. you will recall the latest proposal from mueller willing to limit the number of questions about obstruction of justice. they made clear they wanted to ask the questions in person. they want to limit the questions in person to events that happened before he was inaugurated as the president. that doesn t seem something that mueller is willing to budge on either. the president is at odds with his legal team. he believes if he gets face-to-face with robert mueller he can prove his innocence and that that interview can bring all of this to an end. the president s legal team has made quite clear they do not think this is a good idea. they are advising their client against it. one of the president s attorneys put it best today when he said ultimately this final decision will be up to president trump. thank you very much.
at the time and we can evoke privilege. when it comes