boosting parties were essential work events, this hurts them. events, this hurts them. does she auree events, this hurts them. does she agree that events, this hurts them. does she agree that those events, this hurts them. does she agree that those members - events, this hurts them. does she agree that those members of - events, this hurts them. does she| agree that those members of this, who seem agree that those members of this, who seem to think that abstention is an appropriate response to this debate, an appropriate response to this debate, are wholly wrong, that this debate debate, are wholly wrong, that this debate goes to the heart of the very democratic debate goes to the heart of the very democratic principles on which our democracy democratic principles on which our democracy is founded, and that therefore. democracy is founded, and that therefore, for those people abstaining, they are guilty notjust of cowardice and duplicity but the very contempt f
minister is on will she demand that. duck prime minister is on record will she demand that. duck prime minister is on record in will she demand that. duck prime minister is on record in defending l minister is on record in defending the work minister is on record in defending the work of minister is on record in defending the work of the minister is on record in defending the work of the privileges - the work of the privileges committee. the work of the privileges committee. the work of the privileges committee. . , .. ., .,, committee. he has called out those who have overstepped committee. he has called out those who have overstepped the - committee. he has called out those who have overstepped the mark- committee. he has called out those l who have overstepped the mark from genuine who have overstepped the mark from genuine and legitimate questions around genuine and legitimate questions around process and so forth to attacking around process and so forth to att
looking to devolve further to more local level might be something they could pursue a little bit further. and if could pursue a little bit further. and if we could pursue a little bit further. and if we take the islands. yes, one of the and if we take the islands. yes, one of the criticisms and if we take the islands. yes, one of the criticisms that - and if we take the islands. 1a: one of the criticisms that used to be made of the way westminster operated was that it would give powers to local councils, it would give money to local councils, but usually their hands were tied about how they would spend the money. they could get pots of money to particular things, could get pots of money to particularthings, but could get pots of money to particular things, but effectively it was a national model. are the scottish parliament repeating that mistake or is it much more willing to say ok, here is a problem, here are the funds, you spend them as you see fit? let are the funds, you spe