Stay updated with breaking news from Paralyzeed. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Paralyzeed. gregg: is there something about the republican party they select guys to run who have issues with women? it seems that way, with akin and murdoch. this tells me about what is wrong with the republican party. we have the national republican campaign committee run by republican congressman with a lot of money, they should have been in this race early before the republicans picked a candidate, they should have been in there attacking her on her issues and positions, big labor and all and if they saw san sword sanford was going to win, they should have worked it to keep him from winning. a smart party wants to win. doug, i want to play the democratic congressional committee ad. listen to this. ....
Recess. i mean what is he going to do? if the senate leaves for a weekend will he decide to weekend appoint then? this isn t the president s prerogative, there is a constitutional precedent. but the context is the president wants to say congress is obstructionist and line up as many examples as he can give. this is going to be one of them. bret: a.b.? i think partisan on both sides. he knew it would. it makes democrats happy he did this and makes the republicans furious he did this. you call it illegal power grab. if you look at persuadable independent voters who see the congress as paralyzeed i don t know that he does too much damage to himself with the recess appointment. whether or not it becomes a big political issue, it is a big issue. if the president wants to breach the constitution to achieve something important, let s say he needs a secretary of defense and he can t have it. he says okay, i ll decide, the senate is in recess and i ll do it. that is one thing. but as repo ....
In recess. if the senate is not in recess. i mean what is he going to do? if the senate leaves for a weekend will he decide to weekend appoint then? this isn t the president s prerogative, there is a constitutional precedent. but the context is the president wants to say congress is obstructionist and line up as many examples as he can give. this is going to be one of them. bret: a.b.? i think partisan on both sides. he knew it would. it makes democrats happy he did this and makes the republicans furious he did this. you call it illegal power grab. if you look at persuadable independent voters who see the congress as paralyzeed i don t know that he does too much damage to himself with the recess appointment. whether or not it becomes a big political issue, it is a big issue. if the president wants to breach the constitution to achieve something important, let s say he needs a secretary of defense and he can t have it. he says okay, i ll decide, the senate is in recess and i ll do ....
Recess. i mean what is he going to do? if the senate leaves for a weekend will he decide to weekend appoint then? this isn t the president s prerogative, there is a constitutional precedent. but the context is the president wants to say congress is obstructionist and line up as many examples as he can give. this is going to be one of them. bret: a.b.? i think partisan on both sides. he knew it would. it makes democrats happy he did this and makes the republicans furious he did this. you call it illegal power grab. if you look at persuadable independent voters who see the congress as paralyzeed i don t know that he does too much damage to himself with the recess appointment. whether or not it becomes a big political issue, it is a big issue. if the president wants to breach the constitution to achieve something important, let s say he needs a secretary of defense and he can t have it. he says okay, i ll decide, the senate is in recess and i ll do it. that is one thing. but as repo ....
In recess. if the senate is not in recess. i mean what is he going to do? if the senate leaves for a weekend will he decide to weekend appoint then? this isn t the president s prerogative, there is a constitutional precedent. but the context is the president wants to say congress is obstructionist and line up as many examples as he can give. this is going to be one of them. bret: a.b.? i think partisan on both sides. he knew it would. it makes democrats happy he did this and makes the republicans furious he did this. you call it illegal power grab. if you look at persuadable independent voters who see the congress as paralyzeed i don t know that he does too much damage to himself with the recess appointment. whether or not it becomes a big political issue, it is a big issue. if the president wants to breach the constitution to achieve something important, let s say he needs a secretary of defense and he can t have it. he says okay, i ll decide, the senate is in recess and i ll do ....