Is important. we need red line and be proactive and say what is not acceptable. if russia deciding to go and go further with weapons that really can cause a lot of problems to all of us, to the whole world, i think it needs to be said clearly international community, not just us, we need countries like china and other ones say, you know what, you can do a lot of these things but you are not going to be waving your flag with nuclear and all of this different chemical things because this is a dangerous conversation to have. so i think we need to be p proactive on things like that and say the response will be very different and russia needs to get to the table and stop doing this things. i think some things need to be beforehand and i hope that, you know, we ll have more leadership on this issue. there is, remarkably really, that europe, the world is still
Involved militarily in syria including arming the resistance and beyond. what does it do to mitt romney s position as an authority on foreign policy, as somebody who could be commander in chief, to have john mccain, still the guy holding the republican party s banner on this? i don t think it does much because romney, the few things he said about foreign policy, the few positions he has articulated, he s going for the i m going to be as hawkish as possible. he s trying to duck the syria questions. you have mccain being more p proactive there. but what he said about iran, romney basically saying i want the military option on the table, i don t want anybody holding me back. my israel policy is go to be the opposite of obamas. so the theme is from romney is to strike a hawkish note, and i think what he s trying to go for is this carktuicature of obama t