sadly, i understand she contracted it and it s been delayed a week. we wish her well and hope she recoversrs quickly and butis this is now times v. sullivan, which is for public figures. the standard of p you have to prove malice seems to be teetering on the brink here. where do you see it? well, the new times case, supreme court case, new york times versus sullivan established the actual malice w standard. they said that we were deceptive. sean,epti the new york times reported that our videos in september 2020 weree . ceptive that was the guy that had more than three ballots in his car . defamation. for the judge in new york state, charles wood arguing denyingss their motion to dismiss our lawsuit said it was the new o york times that engaged in disinformation and deception . also christmas eve ruling n. shorn of last year where they said they had to sequester our attorney client r privilege mems . sean, the newis york times published my private lawyer p correspondence after the fbi r