I don t know how that s going to help you. some of them said we re going to impeach biden. they re not quite sure why. or what for. but that s irrelevant to them. even gop so-called moderate wing won t defy the impeachment push. take a look at how glen yunkin answered when asked about impreaching president biden. i believe strongly that our democracy is better when our congress exercises the oversight functions. joining us now, chief white house correspondent for the new york times, peter baker. peter, in your latest piece which i encourage everyone to read, you said that president biden expected the fever of polarizing politics to have been broken by this point in this presidency. instead, as we just heard, republicans are talking about
Responsible for operation warp speed doing a kind of 180 worthy of calling out. after all, we ve known about his vaccination status for quite some time. for me it s the 180s from some republican members of congress on january 6th. it s the 180s on which elections on the same ballot i might add are somehow fraudulent, and which should actually count. the 180s on bipartisanship, the 180s on the need to fortify voting rights, on supreme court precedent, on honoring congressional subpoenas. the 180s on legitimacy of the oversight functions of our congress and even by its own members. republicans had no problem pushing numerous investigations into benghazi, but it s more than convenient reversals that bother me. it s that some feel like they are pulling one over on you. the thought that you re not only gullible but have the short-term memory of ted lasso s goldfish. they re hoping that you will buy into their rewrite rather than holding them accountable, and i
Booster because they had the vaccine, and they all they re answering it like in other words the answer is yes, but they don t want to say it because they re gutless. you got to say it, whether you had it or not, say it. well, that s rich, and man, what a change. but it s not just the man responsible for operation warp speed doing a kind of 180 worthy of calling out. after all, we ve known about his vaccination status for quite some time. for me it s the 180s from some republican members of congress on january 6th. it s the 180s on which elections on the same ballot i might add are somehow fraudulent, and which should actually count. the 180s on bipartisanship, the 180s on the need to fortify voting rights, on supreme court precedent, on honoring congressional subpoenas. the 180s on legitimacy of the oversight functions of our congress and even by its own members. republicans had no problem pushing numerous investigations
Investigations needed? it s important to have multiple venues for investigation. the inspector general will take a look. it will be a comprehensive one as to whether misconduct occurred inside doj. it won t be a criminal investigation, it will be more of an administrative overview, and typically these things can take months. for instance, the investigation into former fbi director andy mccabe, acting director took about eight months to complete, and that one was done on a quick timeline. so it s critical that the house engage in oversight functions. as in the case of mcgahn where it let that subpoena run for two years, it will be important for it to reassert its priorities and its determination to get this sort of information because it s important that we get a full picture of what went on here. it s not entirely clear. was this incidental collection of congressional data pursuant to a legitimate properly
What is missing from the constitution. she writes, what is missing from the constitution s framework as the framers envisioned it is the president s purported power to kneecap house investigations of executive branch operations by demanding that his senior level aides breach their legal duty to respond to compelled congressional process. this judge is not holding back on her view of how the president and his legal team have interpreted congressional subpoenas, and as mieke was talking about, congressional oversight. yeah. there are some people who i think are baselessly claiming, you know, well some of these judges don t like trump or his policies. i ll tell you, ali, i think the judiciary doesn t like people disobeying the law or making up laws like executive privilege to really try to avoid proper oversight functions. so and i actually think i heard you say that mick mulvaney is putting out a statement that he s still going to refuse to comply. he s going to listen to trump if