supported the introduction of a stronger pricing on flights and the instruction of a frequent flyer levy, and it is worth or mining that 70% of flights in the uk are taken by 15% of the population, so this is essentially a tax deduction on both the flyers around the country, and as i said, it is perverse from the revenue perspective. it as i said, it is perverse from the revenue perspective. as i said, it is perverse from the revenue perspective. if flights in the uk are revenue perspective. if flights in the uk are now revenue perspective. if flights in the uk are now cheaper, - revenue perspective. if flights in the uk are now cheaper, how. revenue perspective. if flights in | the uk are now cheaper, how are revenue perspective. if flights in - the uk are now cheaper, how are you going to persuade people not to take them? it going to persuade people not to take them? , ., , ., , ., them? it is a brilliant question. calculation them? it is a brilliant question. calculation toda