To understand first is our conflict of interest? we verify that the work was different. reclaiming my time. mr. eastern filed this is you putting yourself as the czar of conflicts. your scheme worked really well for mckenzie. mckenzie got contracts purdue goderich and america got addicted. since 2008 mackenzie earn 100 and $40 million in contracts from the fda. and you did not ever disclose your work for purdue. you did not disclose your conflicts of interest. so my question for you as since you didn t disclose the conflicts of interest. will you return to $140 million to the fda? so they were working for the biggest opioid pusher on the planet purdue pharma. and the fda. at the same time. absolutely. the same people. the same people at the same time. now it s possible and this is
Addicted. since 2000, eight mackenzie earned $140 million in contracts from the fda. and you did not ever disclose your work for purdue. you did not disclose your conflicts of interest. so my question for you as since you didn t disclose the conflicts of interest. will you return to $140 million to the fda? so they were working for the biggest opioid pusher on the planet purdue pharma. and the fda. at the same time. absolutely. the same people. the same people at the same time. now it s possible and this is their argument that we were doing something so unrelated for the fda to drug regulation, that it didn t affect our work for purdue on the topic of drug regulation. the real fundamental point is you, mckenzie, doesn t get to decide. you are not, as i said, the