court. can you explain how you see those responses? i don t think those responses could fairly be understood as saying it would never be overruled. i think they all made clear like any other precedent, it subject to stare decisis and weighed in some degree of deference. the whole dock trick of stare decisis has in it some factors that are consulted, that may lead a court to overrule a prior precedent. and the draft opinion that was circulated went in to all of that. now, i think we don t want to get ahead of ourselves. that draft had five voted locked in. i think things could be in flux. martha: really? why? personally. you say why? martha: yes. yeah, well, because i an opinion isn t final until almost