Education-related payments for use of their name, image, likeness and bush petitioned to get his award reinstated to no avail. he claims the ncaa defamed him and was never involved if a pay-for-play operation n a petition, he is asking for a reconsideration of their decision based on what bush s attorney, ben crump, calls a flawed and sloppy investigation. the ncaa has declined to comment on the lawsuit and also the petition. joining me now is civil rights attorney and attorney for reggie bush, ben crump. so nice to see you, attorney crump. this is something that so many people remember happening at the time and it s really lived in infamy for a variety of reasons. particularly given the conversations about ncaa athletes. what makes you believe that they might be amenable now to returning it or to even being successful in a defamation suit?