accidental as opposed to intentional strike. and as a u.s. military fibl i ve known for a number of years remained me, the russians don t always have the greatest aim. we ve seen that with strikes intended for military facilities that hit non-milt tmilitary facilities. et cetera. we have to factors that in before we discuss scenarios where nato is invoking article 5 to go to war with russia to defend their own. we re not there yet. this shows the tremendous danger of waging a war on europe s largest country and firing an incredible amount of munitions at that country with frequency and not always the accuracy that you would like. frankly, russia often doesn t care what it hits, right, on ukrainian territory. they deliberately target civilians and other targets. that s something to keep in mind. before we get to a space here where we have nato declaring war on russia or a coordinated military response, the facts don t justify that at this point. now, we do know that u.s.
secondly, as i made clear, we want to make sure that the economic cost to the kremlin of doing so is sufficiently severe that they think twice. so evelyn, in your mind, is that shoulder to shoulder? well, joe, i think it is. i think what he s saying there is we re not going to send nato forces, british forces to the front lines to fight the russians directly. but indirectly, we re going to continue doing what we have been doing, that is the alliance, training ukrainians, on ukrainian territory. that s what we have been doing all along in the west. and assuming that putin doesn t seize the whole country, we can continue to do that. and in addition to that, the nato alliance of members and the alliance itself are helping arm ukraine. and that s ongoing. and in fact, we have seen that the administration, the u.s. administration and the british government willing to continue, not just continue but to ratchet up the amount of arms being sent
ukraine. we are joined in a few minutes by labours a deputy leader, for her views on all of. that what s next in the scandal of p&o? as the boss prepares to face questions. we ll talk to one of the 800 workers sacked by the company. it s tuesday the 29th of march. investigating partygate, sky news understands more than 20 fines could be issued today. u.s. and telegenic doubt over claims that russian oligarch roman abramovich and ukrainian peace negotiators were poisoned. on ukrainian territory. i m live in lviv, as ukrainian and russian officials meet for peace talks in turkey. with early signs ukraine may be willing to reach a compromise. but hopes for a breakthrough remain low. inside mariupol, new pictures show the devastation in the city. as ukrainian forces say they have retaken irpin, and some of their towns.
to the ukrainian military. the new arms include anti-tank missiles. as you might know for years the former soviet states have been at war against separatists in the conduct. and steve is in southern florida, hi, steve. leland, the sale by the use of anti-tank missiles would be significant escalation for forces since 2014, on ukrainian territory have been battling russian-backed separatist fighters. those fighters have tanks and with those anti-tank missiles, that could be a game changer on the ground. these modern anti-tank systems, they re portable, weigh 50 pounds, they can take out a tank from a mile and a half away. thisser fire and forget welcomes. they could be a game changer. the reaction in moscow has been