issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest
smerconish in philadelphia. in september of 2019, joe biden was asked how many$#ursqj he ha spoken to son hunter about his overseas business activities. the then candidate s answer a was this. i have never spoken to my son about that. that has remained his answer until this week. on monday white house press secretary was asked about this issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer remains the same. but in fact the first time instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman pointed out the insistent sit, but she insisted the answer was the same. i just want to clear this up once if and are all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with
Payments to the bidens, though he didn t specify who received the bribes. it cost $5 million to pay one bidean$5 million to pay another biden, htold the fbi informant at the 2016 meeting, according to the document. the informant whom the fbi described as highly credible as not been able to provide any opinion as the veracity of the claims and as phillip bump reported in8%d the washington post, he has in the past denied ever speaking with the bidens. i hear some of you saying that s an unverified account. true. that doesn t mean all inquiry should end. just it needs to be corroborated. on monday the oversight committee will conduct a transcribed interview with a former close business associate of hunter biden. the new yorst previewed the testimony and he will say he s witness to calling his father in the midst of business dealings. and there s that whatsapp
Veracity of the claims. and as phillip bump has reported in the washington post, he has denied in the past ever speaking with the bidens. i hear some of you saying that s an unverified account. true. that doesn t mean all inquiry should end. just that it needs to be corroborated. on monday the oversight committee will conduct a transcribed interview with a devin archer, a former business associate of hunter biden. the new york post says she s previewed the testimony and he will say he s witness to calling his father in the midst of business dealings. and there s that whatsapp messa alleges hunter sent a ceo of a chinese fund management company in 2017. according to this testimony, the message said i m sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the mmitment has not been fulfilled. tell the director that i wou like to resolve this now befe it gets out of hand, and now