Of the 2016 election. To really understand why the socalled catch and kill scheme wasnt just about preventing negative press, just something all celebrities do, as Lindsey Graham tried to spin it a few days ago, well get in our Way Back Machine and take a trip down mem memory lane. After donald trump clifrm clinched the republican nomination and there is referred to his women problems, among female voters. The low Approval Ratings were fueled by his own rhetoric and his attacks against ted cruzs wife, a republican candidate carly and his long history of crude and vile remarks, not to mention his Flagrantly Misogynistic approach to his opponent Hillary Clinton and look at how that showed up in the polls for him. 73 of voters had a negative view of donald trump by midmarch of the election year. 64 of women voters in April Of 2016 said they have a quote, strongly unfavorably view of trump. In the middle of all of this, attorney Keith Davidson sends a text to the editor at the National Enq
Rights issue now because that might especially the question of changing a senate rule to do it, because that might lose him or would lose him a couple of votes on the build back better plan. today he said that voting rights is absolutely the most important thing. that is a change of priority for him. it is a change of tone. what do you think that means? well, hopefully it means that they recognize that the threat is here. it s omni present, and it s going to continue, but no matter what you want to look at it this way. the filibuster is a problem to get anything done. you know, we re talking about abortion rights. we re not going to be able to protect roe v. wade once the supreme court overturns it because we re never going to have the 60 votes to protect roe v. wade. you re talking about any type of legislation to help working class people, it s not going to happen. you don t have a republican party that wants to compromise to help working class people.
Right now to be really honest with you in which direction this goes. jared keeps the environment calm around him. unlike a lot of political operatives who run around and stress and throw things against the wall. i ve never heard him raise his voice. someone like michael flynn who is proposing things on foreign policy front and obvious example would be to do with islamic state and is proposing something that is impetuous or might not work or sound simple but could cause long-term problems, my question is what role does jared play calming influence in that situation? how much is he going to be on top of specific policy and how much is he going to be engaged in some of the trickier decisions that the president is going to have to make and how much is he going to give him space to make those decisions without necessarily have the last influence of michael flynn or steve bannon who are some of the more hot heads in the white house at the moment. jared is there all the time. he s omni pr
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20150918:19:01:00 comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Jacket in the barn. i don t think you will want it back. anyhow, if god is only nip tent and omni present, doesn t it give humans free will by definition? it is set in motion by the one that knows the outcome and then those responsibilities cannot rest on those participating in the events. talking about the free will and lost jacket left in the dark, i once left here in the fox green room my kak ket and collar and it went missing. there is somebody out there that used their free will in a terrible way, probably for halloween. that is a great question. there is no such thing i would say there is no such thing as free will, unless there is god. our free will mirrors a supernatural presence that says i am not just responding