dissents in her opinion, which concurred in part. still, these justices, thomas, alito, kavanaugh, gorsuch, roberts and barrett seemed to treat the allegations and the indictment that brought this ground breaking case to the supreme court as more of an academic moment than an existential one. the allegations that the former president of the united states while in office tried to use the levers of power to keep himself in office. reading the decision can seem circular, even. the president is immune because the constitution implies he is immune, even when highs trying to violate the same constitution. the dissents were so scathing, instead, plowing through the majority s reasoning. from justice jackson, quote, the majority of my colleagues seem to have put their trust in our court s ability to prevent presidents from becoming kings through case-by-case application of the indeterminate standards of their new presidential accountability paradigm. i fear that they are wrong, but f
list. she s the host of the takeaway. peter beiart author of the crisis of zionism political writer for the daily beast and will cain is a columnist for theblaze.com. nice to have you all. another trayvon martin march this morning, this time of course the defense team for the martin family is hoping to bring some pressure on investigators, not only to arrest george zimmerman as they ve continually maintained, they also want to look into the attorney who apparently sort of dismissed the lead investigator s efforts to have george zimmerman charged. that s right. it was on the original police reports as manslaughter and supposedly they re alleging it was interfered with and want the department of justice to open a second investigation. they re opening an investigation into the case of trayvon martin s death and they want to open a second one to see if the florida officials interfered. it will be interesting to see hate crimes of course are notoriously difficult to prov