Truth. Those facts. This is so far off field, this is ispolitical. This is totally political. And it is a dangerous moment for our country that the doj has i mean, doesnt the meeting on the tarmac with bill clinton and the airplane look quaint now . Actually, thats a perfect it looks quaint. We have been talking about what feels like a frantic publicrelations effort. Two statements released from william barr on a report hes had for some time. An extraordinary report about ao open,t ongoing investigation. Some of the most sensitive intelligence and Law Enforcement in our country. And now, guess whos weighing in . Guess. Guess. Guess. Donald j. Trump. Lets listen. Okay. Thank you very much. The ig report just came out. And i was just briefed on it and its a disgrace whats happened with respect to the things that were done to our country. It should never again happen to another president. It is incredible. Far worse than i would have ever thought possible. And its its an embarrassment to
With the findings in the horowitz report. Horrow its seems to be giving the fbi that part of the investigation saying its a clean bill. They had enough reason to do this investigation. Everybody who was interviewed cements to indicate they did not open an investigation. Evan perez, thank you so much. Joining our panel now, we have with us jim bakker. You are not singled out the report makes clear the fbi failed when it came to the administering the fisa warrants, too much was left out or not presented to the court. Do you accept what the Inspector General is saying . I am there are two big groups of conclusions, one is, it was not a politically motivated
investigation and it was properly predicated with us goingforward with that investigation. It was malpractice for us not to open this investigation. All of the statements that it was a hoax are wrong. The investigation was not a coup or a coup attempt. Having said that, he does point out many mistakes that were made with respect to err
yes. let s move on to ambassador sondland. i only have ten fingers and ten toes, i can t count above 20 but do you know how many times ambassador sondland said that he did not know, he did not recall, had no recollection or had limited memory or failed to remember something in his october 17th testimony? do you know how many times? 325. does that surprise you? 325. a big number. and then he filed a clarifying statement and he clarifies a few things, i guess. but did you have any do you have any contact with ambassador sondland between the time of his deposition and the time of his clarifying statement? no. did the majority? i have no idea. you have no idea. so they may have had influence on his testimony? no idea. and that is evidence of bias. that would be evidence of credibility. that would be evidence that we
to influence the election. yes. let s move on to ambassador sondland.on i only have ten fingers and ten toes. i can t count above 20, mr.n castor. but do you know how many times ambassadorw sondland said thate did not know, did not recall, had no recollection, had limited memory, or failed to remember something in his october 17th testimony? do you know how many times? 325. does that surprise you? 325. it s a big number. and then he files a clarifying statement, and he clarifies a few things, i guess. but do you have any contact with ambassador sondland between the time of his deposition and the time of his clarifying statement? yeah. did the majority? i have no idea. you have noit idea? so they may have had influence on his testimony. and that would be evidence of e bias. that would bece evidence of