Wasnt just showing up for court. Numerous january 6th cases have been heard. The judge overseeing trumps arraignment has also overseen the cases of people including dominic fox and Qanon Activist who live streamed the storming of the capitol, a jared wise, a former fbi agent charged with assaulting a Police Officer on january 6th. This is all very much a Trip Down Memory Lane for mr. Trump. Now, there were no Courtroom Cameras today, but thanks to courtroom sketch artist bill hennessy, we know what it looks like when a former president of the United States appeared in court to be formally and federally charged for trying to subvert american democracy. There were more than 110 people in the courtroom to hear this arraignment including several of the federal judges who have been presiding over other january 6th cases, judges who showed up today in plain clothes as spectators for trumps arraignment. The judge presiding over the arraignment was a New York State judge inasmuch he read the c
mar-a-lago case obviously without classification issue. so the idea this thing would go to trial in under 15 months setting aside any election is just not practical from a standpoint of how federal criminal cases are tried. that s interesting because there s been a lot of attempted tea leaf reading about when judge would schedule this. you believe it s 15 months. how surprised, and what avenues of appeals exist if the judge decides to do this, does the trump team have any recourse if that ends up being the case? you know, the ability to go to the appellate court in the middle of a case is pretty limited, but really all they have to do is file motions. once you file motions then they have to setout a motion