It sarcastically, if you are out of money you could get a court appointed lawyer. there are great lawyers that are court appointed. but if this is a stall tactic it is not going to work. you know, as part of the conditions for the former president, barred from intimidating witnesses or otherwise instruction in cases of obstructing on social media, what are the options actually available to a judge if he were to violate that agreement? he certainly will push it to the line or beyond, what can a judge really do? well, there is a range of options, and i am adamant that any judge would tread lightly here. so, one option is, you bring him into court and you say you did x, it violated my rule, do not do it again. to some degree we saw this in the roger stone prosecution. then that doesn t work, to bring it back again, and then you can cite him for contempt if it is a clear violation, you can cite him for contempt. you could wind up, there could be sanctions for that. you could wind up re